<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=418351661899748&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
bg-img3.jpg

Nonstop Wellness Blog

High-quality benefits for nonprofits.

Are High Out-Of-Pocket Costs Forcing Patients To Settle For Substandard Care? - Forbes

Peter Ubel writes for Forbes about the cost-benefit decisions doctors and patients must make in the face of rising out-of-pocket healthcare costs.

Read the full article at: www.forbes.com

Ubel uses an example of a woman who must choose between a CT scan or a more thorough PET scan to check her body for cancerous tumors. Decisions like these must be made every day by patients who cannot afford the increasing out-of-pocket healthcare costs. Sometimes the decisions are simple, and a less expensive medical test will yield similar results. But what happens when a cheaper alternative is not as good? Are patients forced to settle for sub-standard care?

When people pay out-of-pocket for a significant portion of their medical expenses, we can expect them to make these kinds of tough decisions. Good decision-making requires doctors and patients to weigh the pros and cons of all available alternatives, including the financial burden patients might experience from high out-of-pocket costs.

It's important for nonprofits to keep out-of-pocket
healthcare 
costs low for employees even in the
face of budget cuts - download our guide to learn more:

Download the Guide Now

Subscribe to Email Updates

Most Read Posts

The information and materials herein are provided for general information purposes only and are not intended to constitute legal or other advice or opinions on any specific matters and are not intended to replace the advice of a qualified attorney, plan provider or other professional advisor. This information has been taken from sources believed to be reliable, but there is no guarantee as to its accuracy. In accordance with IRS Circular 230, this communication is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used as or considered a ‘covered opinion’ or other written tax advice and should not be relied upon for any purpose other than its intended purpose